KOMUNIKASI POLITIK PROFETIK: Etika, Kekuasaan, Media, dan Demokrasi di Era Digital

Authors

Achmad Nashrudin Priatna
Universitas Bina Bangsa
Rizqi Fitrianti
Universitas Bina Bangsa
Endayani Endayani
Universitas Bina Bangsa

Keywords:

Komunikasi Politik, Politik Profetik, Etika Politik, Etika, Kekuasaan, Media, Demokrasi, Era Digital

Synopsis

Perkembangan teknologi digital menghadirkan tantangan berat bagi ruang publik, mulai dari disinformasi, polarisasi, hingga manipulasi opini. Buku KOMUNIKASI POLITIK PROFETIK: Etika, Kekuasaan, Media, dan Demokrasi di Era Digital hadir menawarkan pendekatan komprehensif yang menempatkan etika, kebenaran, serta kemanusiaan sebagai fondasi utama komunikasi politik.

Melalui orientasi humanisasi, liberasi, dan transendensi, referensi ini mengulas keterkaitan antara kekuasaan, media, dan demokrasi secara kritis. Pembahasan mencakup kerangka etika, ruang publik deliberatif, mediatisasi, hingga dinamika era digital seperti sistem algoritma, propaganda jaringan, dan gerakan sosial masyarakat sipil.

Disajikan secara lugas dan sistematis, buku ini sangat relevan dipelajari oleh mahasiswa, akademisi, praktisi media, serta pemerhati demokrasi. Karya ini menjadi panduan strategis untuk membangun literasi politik yang sehat dan mewujudkan tata kelola komunikasi publik yang berintegritas.

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Arifin, A. (2011). Komunikasi politik: Filsafat, paradigma, teori, tujuan, strategi, dan komunikasi politik Indonesia. Graha Ilmu.

Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. (2024, March 25). Bawaslu sampaikan evaluasi pengawasan Pemilu 2024 ke DPR. https://www.bawaslu.go.id/id/berita/bawaslu-sampaikan-evaluasi-pengawasan-pemilu-2024-ke-dpr

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Statistik telekomunikasi Indonesia 2024. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2025/08/29/beaa2be400eda6ce6c636ef8/statistik-telekomunikasi-indonesia-2024.html

Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.

Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596

Cangara, H. (2016). Komunikasi politik: Konsep, teori, dan strategi. Rajawali Pers.

Castells, M. (2013). Communication power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.

Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. SAGE.

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity.

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.

D’Angelo, P. (2012). Studying framing in political communication with an integrative approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426332

Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160

Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Republik Indonesia. (2025, December 10). LAPKIN DKPP 2025: 198 perkara diputus dan libatkan 950 penyelenggara pemilu. https://dkpp.go.id/lapkin-dkpp-2025-198-perkara-diputus-dan-libatkan-950-penyelenggara-pemilu/

Dewan Pers. (2025, January 7). Tantangan berat pers di masa mendatang. https://dewanpers.or.id/read/news/07-01-2025-tantangan-berat-pers-di-masa-mendatang

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger, Trans.). MIT Press.

Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.

Hamad, I. (2004). Konstruksi realitas politik dalam media massa: Sebuah studi critical discourse analysis terhadap berita-berita politik. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Hameleers, M. (2024). Cheap versus deep manipulation: The effects of cheapfakes versus deepfakes in a political setting. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 36(1), edae004. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edae004

Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034

Kaid, L. L. (Ed.). (2004). Handbook of political communication research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital Republik Indonesia. (2025, August 8). Konsultasi publik Buku Putih Peta Jalan Kecerdasan Artifisial Nasional dan Konsep Pedoman Etika Kecerdasan Artifisial. https://portal.komdigi.go.id/kanal-publik/berita-kini/9531

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital Republik Indonesia. (2026, February 12). Pemerintah bahas Peta Jalan Kecerdasan Artifisial Indonesia 2026–2029 dalam rapat lintas kementerian. https://jdih.komdigi.go.id/berita/view/113

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. (2023). Surat Edaran Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Nomor 9 Tahun 2023 tentang Etika Kecerdasan Artifisial. https://jdih.komdigi.go.id/produk_hukum/view/id/883/

Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. (2024a). Keputusan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 360 Tahun 2024 tentang penetapan hasil Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Provinsi, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Kabupaten/Kota secara nasional dalam Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2024. https://jdih.kpu.go.id/keputusan-kpu/detail/yNaxBTYL1i7tarwlNPNidk9tSHErMUNha0J2eUV6K2VRNXdDbWc9PQ

Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. (2024b, June 5). Pilkada harus teguhkan anak bangsa untuk tetap jaga persatuan. https://www.kpu.go.id/berita/baca/12406/pilkada-harus-teguhkan-anak-bangsa-untuk-tetap-jaga-persatuan

Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. (2025, February 10). KPU luncurkan Indeks Partisipasi Pemilu 2024. https://www.kpu.go.id/berita/baca/12788/kpu-luncurkan-indeks-partisipasi-pemilu-2024

Kreiss, D. (2016). Prototype politics: Technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy. Oxford University Press.

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE.

Kuntowijoyo. (2006). Islam sebagai ilmu: Epistemologi, metodologi, dan etika. Tiara Wacana.

Kuntowijoyo. (2008). Paradigma Islam: Interpretasi untuk aksi. Mizan.

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018

Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2024a, April 22). MK tolak dalil Ganjar–Mahfud menyoal dugaan pelanggaran Pemilu Presiden 2024. https://www.mkri.id/berita/-20215

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2024b, April 22). MK tolak permohonan Anies–Muhaimin, tiga hakim sampaikan pendapat berbeda. https://www.mkri.id/berita/-20214

Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F., & Warren, M. E. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale (pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press.

Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). “Mediatization” of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198613

McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion (2nd ed.). Polity.

McNair, B. (2018). An introduction to political communication (6th ed.). Routledge.

Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Routledge.

Nimmo, D. D. (1978). Political communication and public opinion in America. Goodyear Publishing Company.

Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. (2025, January 22). Jumlah laporan masyarakat ke Ombudsman RI meningkat. https://ombudsman.go.id/pers/r/jumlah-laporan-masyarakat-ke-ombudsman-ri-meningkat

Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199

Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319097

Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.

Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.

UNESCO. (2023). Guidelines for the governance of digital platforms: Safeguarding freedom of expression and access to information through a multistakeholder approach. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387339

Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media + Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408

van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe.

Woolley, S. C., & Howard, P. N. (Eds.). (2018). Computational propaganda: Political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Oxford University Press.

Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.

Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J., Möller, J., Kruikemeier, S., Ó Fathaigh, R., Irion, K., Dobber, T., Bodo, B., & de Vreese, C. H. (2018). Online political microtargeting: Promises and threats for democracy. Utrecht Law Review, 14(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.420

Published

30 August 2026